The Secret Behind Martin Garrix’s ‘Avoidance’ of His Biggest Hit: Boredom or Genius Strategy?
In the high-speed world of electronic dance music, artists often rise and fall with the power of one hit. For Martin Garrix, however, the 28-year-old Dutch DJ who took the world by storm with “Animals”, the story is much more complex. The question haunting both fans and industry insiders alike is: why has Garrix seemingly avoided performing or even mentioning his most iconic track? Is it creative fatigue, personal boredom, or a calculated move to keep his brand alive and evolving in an industry obsessed with reinvention?
A Hit That Defined an Era
When “Animals” exploded in 2013, Martin Garrix was just 17 — a teenager suddenly catapulted to global fame. The track didn’t just dominate festival stages; it reshaped the entire EDM landscape. With its dark, minimal drops and hypnotic rhythm, “Animals” became a defining anthem of the 2010s, turning Garrix into a headliner overnight. For many, it was the song that introduced them to electronic music itself. Yet, in recent years, the DJ who once proudly dropped that track at every show has gradually distanced himself from it. It’s a puzzling move, considering how many artists would cling to such a career-defining record. But Garrix seems to operate differently.

The Boredom Theory
One explanation, echoed in music circles, is simple: boredom. Playing the same track for over a decade could naturally drain any artist’s enthusiasm. Imagine performing the same three minutes of music hundreds of times a year while your sound, style, and vision evolve. For Garrix, who has since collaborated with pop stars like Dua Lipa, Bebe Rexha, and Usher, returning to the raw minimalism of “Animals” might feel creatively limiting. In interviews over the years, he’s hinted that while he’s proud of his breakout hit, he doesn’t feel connected to it anymore. It was the product of a teenage producer — not the refined, genre-fluid artist he’s become. Has Martin Garrix simply outgrown his biggest hit? Or is there something more deliberate behind the decision?
The Genius Branding Strategy
Here’s where the theory deepens. Some insiders believe Garrix’s avoidance is not a matter of boredom but a calculated brand move. Unlike many EDM acts who ride one anthem until it fades, Garrix may be deliberately distancing himself from “Animals” to redefine his musical identity. By stepping away from his past, he creates curiosity — and curiosity fuels engagement. Every omission, every silence surrounding that track, becomes a statement. The less he plays it, the more fans talk about it. It’s reverse marketing at its smartest. Garrix, after all, has grown from a teenage festival act into a global brand — running his own label, STMPD RCRDS, collaborating with mainstream icons, and performing on the world’s biggest stages. In this evolution, holding onto a 2013 banger might conflict with his carefully crafted image of maturity, artistry, and forward-thinking innovation.
The Reinvention of a Superstar
Unlike some DJs who stagnate creatively, Garrix has actively pushed beyond the EDM festival bubble. He’s produced cinematic anthems, radio-friendly pop collaborations, and emotional soundtracks that prove his versatility. This reinvention has allowed him to remain relevant even as the EDM “big room” trend faded. His avoidance of “Animals” could be seen as a metaphor for shedding the past, stepping into new creative spaces. Many artists struggle to escape the shadow of their first success. Garrix, instead of running from it, may be using it as silent leverage — acknowledging its existence while refusing to be confined by it. By ignoring “Animals” in his setlists, he forces fans to engage with his newer work, creating a fresh narrative around his current sound.
A Silent Statement to the Industry
There’s another layer to this story: the industry itself. The EDM scene is notorious for recycling formulas — massive drops, repetitive synth lines, and predictable structures. Garrix, who’s been part of that system since his teenage years, seems intent on breaking free from it. By avoiding “Animals,” he symbolically rejects the commercial pressure to repeat the same hit formula. It’s a subtle message to both fans and fellow producers: the future belongs to evolution, not repetition. Some have even speculated that Garrix’s silence around the track is an unspoken critique of the “festival factory” mentality — where hits are produced more for crowd reactions than for artistic expression. If true, it would make Garrix not just a DJ but a quiet revolutionary within his own genre.
The Fan Reaction: Between Nostalgia and Curiosity
Of course, fans have noticed. Every time Garrix performs and doesn’t play “Animals,” social media lights up with speculation. Some fans beg for its return, others applaud his artistic growth. But all of them talk — and that’s where the genius of this so-called “avoidance” shines. Controversy drives conversation, and conversation keeps relevance alive. Whether they love it or hate it, fans remain emotionally invested. Each show becomes unpredictable, each omission intentional. Garrix doesn’t need to say a word — his silence becomes his message. The more he avoids “Animals,” the more it becomes mythic, an untouchable relic of EDM’s golden age.
The Evolution of the EDM Superstar Archetype
Garrix’s approach may signal a larger shift in how EDM artists manage their legacies. The old model — endlessly touring the same hits — is giving way to a new generation that prioritizes artistic evolution over repetition. In a world where trends change overnight, clinging to the past can be fatal. Garrix’s strategy, intentional or not, shows an understanding of long-term brand psychology: mystery sustains fame. By keeping fans guessing, he ensures they keep watching. Even his newer tracks — like “High on Life,” “No Sleep,” and “Used to Love” — carry the polish and emotional weight of an artist who’s matured far beyond his teenage breakout. Each one redefines who Martin Garrix is — and who he isn’t.
Boredom or Brilliance?
So, is Martin Garrix just tired of “Animals,” or has he turned boredom into a business strategy? The answer might be both. Boredom can spark innovation. The need to escape repetition can fuel reinvention. By refusing to become a nostalgia act, Garrix stays current, unpredictable, and — crucially — interesting. In an industry that rewards consistency but punishes stagnation, his “avoidance” of his biggest hit might be the smartest career move he’s ever made. After all, what’s more powerful than having a hit song? Having the confidence to walk away from it.
The Legacy Question
Ten years after its release, “Animals” remains one of the most recognizable EDM tracks of all time. Its drop is legendary, its influence undeniable. Yet its creator now stands at a crossroads between nostalgia and innovation. Garrix’s decision not to rely on his biggest hit speaks to a broader truth about artistry in the digital age: to survive, you must evolve faster than your own fame. In that sense, Martin Garrix’s silence says more than a thousand interviews ever could. Whether out of boredom, strategy, or both, he’s managed to transform absence into power — turning what could have been a forgotten chapter into a lasting statement of creative control.
Conclusion
At first glance, Martin Garrix’s avoidance of “Animals” might seem strange — even arrogant. But beneath the surface lies a lesson in modern artistry and brand longevity. In a world obsessed with repetition, Garrix’s restraint is rebellion. By choosing not to live in the shadow of his greatest success, he’s proving that evolution isn’t just optional — it’s essential. Perhaps that’s the true genius of Martin Garrix: knowing that the smartest way to keep people talking is not by playing your biggest hit, but by refusing to. Because sometimes, the silence after the drop speaks louder than the music itself.